Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Emerging markets equity funds would cost $237 (0.47% a year), so B1SM is $459 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
No full calendar year yet.
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | −2.2 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.9 | −3.9 | 3.6 | 8.4YTD |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
No similar funds computed yet.
B1SM questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF?
The issuer of Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a Emerging markets focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does B1SM double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for B1SM, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Bell / Perpetual decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
Among Emerging markets equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.45% a year and index funds 0.41%.
What will I pay in fees for B1SM?
B1SM charges a management fee of 1.34% a year, about $134 for every $10,000 invested. Only 1% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Emerging markets equity funds, the median is 0.45%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets Shares ETF (VGE) at 0.48%, iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEM) at 0.69% and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 0.25%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.26% for B1SM.
Does Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF follow a theme?
No. Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF is a broad equity fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Emerging markets) rather than one theme or sector.
What is under the hood of B1SM?
The issuer doesn't publish B1SM's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF aims to grow your capital faster than its market after fees.
B1SM doesn't have a full year of price history yet, so we can't judge its performance.
As an active fund, B1SM has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.