Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF
Not enough history to chart.
Performance
Total return to —, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Global ex-Australia fixed income funds would cost $151 (0.30% a year), so CISB is $164 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
No full calendar year yet.
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
No similar funds computed yet.
CISB questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF?
The issuer of Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as fixed income with a Global ex-Australia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does CISB double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for CISB, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF managed – active or passive?
Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF is passively managed: it follows an index and holds what that index holds, rather than relying on a manager's stock picks.
Among Global ex-Australia fixed income funds, active funds charge a median 0.59% a year and index funds 0.26%.
What will I pay in fees for CISB?
CISB charges a management fee of 0.57% a year, about $57 for every $10,000 invested. Only 34% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global ex-Australia fixed income funds, the median is 0.28%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond Index (Hedged) ETF (VBND) at 0.20%, Vanguard International Fixed Interest Index (Hedged) ETF (VIF) at 0.20% and Betashares Global Aggregate Bond Currency Hedged ETF (WBND) at 0.19%.
If you would rather have a manager choose the investments, active options such as VanEck Bentham Global Capital Securities Active ETF (GCAP) at 0.59% and Coolabah Active Global Bond Complex ETF (GFXD) at 0.69% cost more.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.30% for CISB.
Does Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF follow a theme?
No. Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF is a broad fixed income fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Global ex-Australia) rather than one theme or sector.
What is under the hood of CISB?
The issuer doesn't publish CISB's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
It follows an index; the issuer's PDS sets out how that index chooses and weights its holdings.
How well has Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF performed?
Based on its category, Colchester Global Government Bond Complex ETF aims mainly to pay a regular income, with capital growth secondary.
CISB doesn't have a full year of price history yet, so we can't judge its performance.
Tracking difference is the gap between a fund's return and its index's return. We don't hold index returns, so we can't measure it for CISB; the issuer reports it in the monthly fact sheet. As a guide, a well-run index fund trails its index by about its fee, here 0.57% a year, and a much bigger gap is a warning sign.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.