Prices to 23 Oct 2026 · ASX report 30 Sept 2026Sign inJoin free
← Screener · Factor / smart beta
DGVADFA · Equity - Global Strategy · Equity · Global ex-Australia · Active

Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF

Fee p.a.
0.40%
ASX report
Fund size
A$1.3b
12m flow A$107m
Yield
3.7%
2 payments / yr
Volatility 3y
11.3%
annualised
Max DD 3y
−10.9%
all-time −10.9%
Listed
2024
19 Aug 2024 · spread 0.18%

Growth of $10,000

Since listing, distributions reinvested
$9k$10k$11k$12k$13k$14k$15k202420252026
$10,000 at listing → $14,470 at 23 Oct 2026. Monthly points, distributions reinvested, before franking.

Performance

Period
Total
ASX
1 month
0.4%
1.4%
3 months
1.9%
—
6 months
13.1%
—
Year to date
15.4%
—
1 year
20.0%
21.8%
3 years p.a.
—
—
5 years p.a.
—
—
10 years p.a.
—
—
Since listing p.a.
19.8%
—

Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.

Sharpe 3y —Vol 1y 9.9%Vol 5y 11.3%Max DD 1y −6.0%Max DD 5y −10.9%Best year 16.8%100% positive years

What it costs to hold

Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.

Hold for
$218over 5 years, or 0.44% a year
Management fee (0.40% a year)
$200
Bid-ask spread (0.18%, paid once)
$18
Brokerage (buy and sell)
$0

A typical fund among Global ex-Australia equity funds would cost $297 (0.59% a year), so DGVA is $78 cheaper.

Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.

Calendar-year returns

2025
16.8%
2026
15.4%

Where the money is

The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.

Monthly returns

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
20260.81.8−2.02.45.35.7−0.90.21.40.015.4YTD
20254.9−0.4−1.7−3.82.62.82.72.11.30.43.81.216.8
2024−0.23.94.9−1.37.4

Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.

Most similar funds

Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.

Code
Fund
Fee
Overlap
Corr 3y
Dimensional Global Core Equity Trust (Unhedged Class) - Active ETF
0.30%
—
0.75
Betashares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
0.29%
—
0.73
iShares S&P Midcap ETF
0.07%
—
0.72
Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF
0.28%
—
0.70
Vanguard MSCI International Small Companies Index ETF
0.32%
—
0.70
iShares S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.07%
—
0.70
Dimensional Global Small Company - Active ETF
0.55%
—
0.69
VanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF
0.59%
—
0.69
Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF
0.03%
—
0.67
Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
0.18%
—
0.67
Compare DGVA with these →

DGVA questions answered

Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.

How diversified is Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF?

The issuer of Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a Global ex-Australia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.

Which ETFs does DGVA double up with most?

We can't compare holdings for DGVA, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, but its returns move most closely with Dimensional Global Core Equity Trust (Unhedged Class) - Active ETF (DGCE) (correlation 0.75), Betashares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS) (correlation 0.73) and iShares S&P Midcap ETF (IJH) (correlation 0.72). A correlation near 1 means the two funds tend to rise and fall together, so holding both adds little diversification.

How is Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF managed – active or passive?

Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at DFA decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.

Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.75% a year and index funds 0.45%.

What will I pay in fees for DGVA?

DGVA charges a management fee of 0.40% a year, about $40 for every $10,000 invested. That is cheaper than 51% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track, where the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, the median is 0.55%.

Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF (VVLU) at 0.28%.

The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.18% for DGVA.

Does Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF follow a theme?

Not a theme as such, but it follows a value investment style: it tilts towards companies that look cheap against their earnings or assets.

Other ASX funds using a value approach include Dimensional Australian Value Trust - Active ETF (DAVA), Vanguard Global Value Equity Active ETF (VVLU), CB GLBL Infrastructure Value (Hedged) Active ETF (CIVH) and CB GLBL Infrastructure Value Active ETF (CUIV).

What is under the hood of DGVA?

The issuer doesn't publish DGVA's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.

As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.

How well has Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF performed?

Based on its category, Dimensional Global Value Trust - Active ETF aims to grow your capital faster than its market after fees.

To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 20.0% over 1 year (median 6.3%; ranked 10 of 121). The medians and rankings compare it with Global ex-Australia equity funds. Since listing in 2024 it has returned 19.8% a year.

As an active fund, DGVA has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.