Fidelity Asia Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Asia equity funds would cost $322 (0.64% a year), so FASI is $287 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.9 | 2.2 | −10.4 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 5.4 | −4.5 | −0.7 | −1.2 | −9.4 | −9.8YTD | ||
| 2025 | −1.0 | 0.3 | −0.3 | −2.4 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 2.6 | −2.3 | −3.3 | 12.9 |
| 2024 | 1.7 | 0.5 | −2.0 | 8.4 | 2.9 | −0.7 | 3.0 | 14.6 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
FASI questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Fidelity Asia Active ETF?
The issuer of Fidelity Asia Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a Asia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does FASI double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for FASI, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, but its returns move most closely with iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEM) (correlation 0.70). A correlation near 1 means the two funds tend to rise and fall together, so holding both adds little diversification.
How is Fidelity Asia Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Fidelity Asia Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Fidelity decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
What will I pay in fees for FASI?
FASI charges a management fee of 1.16% a year, about $116 for every $10,000 invested. Only 6% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Asia equity funds, the median is 0.60%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include iShares Asia 50 ETF (IAA) at 0.29%, iShares MSCI Japan ETF (IJP) at 0.50% and Vanguard FTSE Asia Ex-Japan Shares Index ETF (VAE) at 0.40%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.29% for FASI.
Does Fidelity Asia Active ETF follow a theme?
No. Fidelity Asia Active ETF is a broad equity fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Asia) rather than one theme or sector.
What is under the hood of FASI?
The issuer doesn't publish FASI's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Fidelity Asia Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Fidelity Asia Active ETF aims to grow your capital faster than its market after fees.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned −14.8% over 1 year (median −0.7%; ranked 12 of 17). The medians and rankings compare it with Asia equity funds. Since listing in 2024 it has returned 6.6% a year.
As an active fund, FASI has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.