Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among fixed income funds would cost $265 (0.53% a year), so GOOD is $3 cheaper.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.6 | 0.2 | −0.8 | 2.1 | −1.4 | 2.4 | −0.6 | 0.4 | −0.5 | 0.2 | 2.5YTD | ||
| 2025 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 1.4 | −0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | −0.7 | −0.4 | 5.1 |
| 2024 | 0.4 | 0.2 | −0.0 | −0.1 | 1.2 | −0.1 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.9 | −0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 2023 | 0.4 | −0.7 | −0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | −0.2 | −0.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.7 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
GOOD questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF?
The issuer of Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as fixed income with a Global focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does GOOD double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for GOOD, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Janus Henderson decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
What will I pay in fees for GOOD?
GOOD charges a management fee of 0.50% a year, about $50 for every $10,000 invested. Only 40% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among fixed income funds, the median is 0.50%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Betashares Sustainability leaders Diversified Bond ETF - Currency Hedged (GBND) at 0.39%, Betashares 2030 Fixed Term Corporate Bond Active ETF (30BB) at 0.22% and Betashares 2028 Fixed Term Corporate Bond Active ETF (28BB) at 0.22%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.12% for GOOD.
Does Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF follow a theme?
No. Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF is a broad fixed income fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Global) rather than one theme or sector.
It also applies environmental, social and governance (ESG) screens, excluding companies that fail the issuer's ethical criteria.
What is under the hood of GOOD?
The issuer doesn't publish GOOD's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Active ETF aims mainly to pay a regular income, with capital growth secondary.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 1.5% over 1 year (median 0.7%; ranked 4 of 9) and 5.3% a year over 3 years. The medians and rankings compare it with fixed income funds. Since listing in 2023 it has returned 4.5% a year.
As an active fund, GOOD has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.