Prices to 23 Oct 2026 · ASX report 30 Sept 2026Sign inJoin free
← Screener · Broad market
GRNVVanEck · Equity - Australia Sectors · Equity · Australia · ESG

VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF

Fee p.a.
0.35%
ASX report
Fund size
A$250m
12m flow A$21m
Yield
3.6%
2 payments / yr
Volatility 3y
15.3%
annualised
Max DD 3y
−18.0%
all-time −37.2%
Listed
2016
3 May 2016 · spread 0.08%

Growth of $10,000

Since listing, distributions reinvested
$8k$10k$12k$14k$16k$18k$20k$22k201620182020202220242026
$10,000 at listing → $19,172 at 23 Oct 2026. Monthly points, distributions reinvested, before franking.

Performance

Period
Total
ASX
1 month
1.9%
−1.8%
3 months
3.9%
—
6 months
5.5%
—
Year to date
−0.7%
—
1 year
−5.7%
−3.8%
3 years p.a.
11.7%
10.4%
5 years p.a.
5.7%
6.2%
10 years p.a.
7.2%
—
Since listing p.a.
6.6%
—

Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.

Sharpe 3y 0.50Vol 1y 16.1%Vol 5y 15.0%Max DD 1y −18.0%Max DD 5y −19.1%Best year 24.4%78% positive years

What it costs to hold

Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.

Hold for
$183over 5 years, or 0.37% a year
Management fee (0.35% a year)
$175
Bid-ask spread (0.08%, paid once)
$8
Brokerage (buy and sell)
$0

A typical fund among Australian equity funds would cost $187 (0.37% a year), so GRNV is $4 cheaper.

Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.

Calendar-year returns

2017
6.1%
2018
−3.1%
2019
24.4%
2020
2.3%
2021
18.4%
2022
−10.7%
2023
16.1%
2024
13.6%
2025
8.5%
2026
−0.7%

Where the money is

Look-through exposure as at 3 Sept 2026 · 82 securities · top 10 = 43.9%

Country

Australia100.0%

Monthly returns

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
20261.1−1.5−9.53.2−2.15.80.33.8−1.70.9−0.7YTD
20254.9−2.9−6.36.65.01.31.72.8−1.60.5−1.5−1.58.5
20241.13.53.5−4.0−1.00.66.40.72.7−1.75.3−3.713.6
20236.4−0.50.33.3−1.51.11.9−0.4−4.7−5.16.98.416.1
2022−9.10.25.30.4−4.4−8.86.40.9−7.94.46.6−3.4−10.7
2021−2.80.43.24.01.73.71.44.2−3.81.00.93.418.4
20205.1−7.2−21.88.59.8−0.31.23.7−2.30.48.90.82.3
20193.26.11.12.14.03.32.7−2.1−0.10.34.1−2.424.4
2018−0.5−0.1−4.63.3−0.03.31.11.9−0.9−6.90.9−0.1−3.1
2017−0.82.33.0−3.3−4.12.10.70.4−1.33.31.92.16.1
20160.7−3.25.8−3.9−2.5−2.91.42.6−2.4

Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.

Top holdings

Csl LtdAustralia
5.3%
Westpac Banking CorpAustralia
5.0%
Commonwealth Bank Of AustraliaAustralia
5.0%
Transurban GroupAustralia
5.0%
Macquarie Group LtdAustralia
4.9%
Qbe Insurance Group LtdAustralia
4.5%
Northern Star Resources LtdAustralia
4.0%
Evolution Mining LtdAustralia
3.9%
Brambles LtdAustralia
3.4%
Computershare LtdAustralia
2.8%
Suncorp Group LtdAustralia
2.7%
Scentre GroupAustralia
2.5%
Pilbara Minerals LtdAustralia
2.2%
Sigma Healthcare LtdAustralia
1.9%
Qantas Airways LtdAustralia
1.8%
See all 82 holdings →

Most similar funds

Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.

Code
Fund
Fee
Overlap
Corr 3y
iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
0.09%
52%
0.77
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
0.25%
50%
0.71
Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF
0.16%
49%
0.77
VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Complex ETF
0.35%
48%
0.75
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
0.35%
48%
0.65
SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF
0.05%
48%
0.72
Betashares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF
0.49%
45%
0.70
Global X Australia Ex Financials & Resources ETF
0.25%
43%
0.47
SPDR MSCI Australia Select High Dividend Yield ETF
0.20%
40%
0.62
VanEck MSCI Australian Quality Plus ETF
0.35%
40%
0.67
Compare GRNV with these →

GRNV questions answered

Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.

How diversified is VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF?

VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF holds 82 securities, and its ten largest positions make up 43.9% of the fund, more spread out than the 53.0% typical of Australian equity funds. That makes it moderately diversified.

Its country exposure is almost entirely Australia (100.0%), based on holdings as at 3 Sept 2026.

Which ETFs does GRNV double up with most?

GRNV shares the most holdings with iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF (IESG) (52% overlap), Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF (EX20) (50% overlap) and Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF (VETH) (49% overlap). Overlap is the share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common, looking through to the underlying securities.

At 52%, owning both GRNV and IESG would mostly double up on the same investments rather than spread your money further. Of these, IESG has the lowest fee, at 0.09% a year against 0.35% for GRNV.

How is VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF managed – active or passive?

VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF is passively managed: it follows an index and holds what that index holds, rather than relying on a manager's stock picks.

Among Australian equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.85% a year and index funds 0.34%.

What will I pay in fees for GRNV?

GRNV charges a management fee of 0.35% a year, about $35 for every $10,000 invested. That is cheaper than 58% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track, where the median fee is 0.44%. Among Australian equity funds, the median is 0.35%.

Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS) at 0.07%, Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200) at 0.04% and iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (IOZ) at 0.05%.

If you would rather have a manager choose the investments, active options such as Airlie Australian Share Fund - Active ETF (AASF) at 0.78% and Ausbil Active Sustainable Equity Fund - Active ETF (ASUS) at 1.00% cost more.

The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.08% for GRNV.

Does VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF follow a theme?

No. VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF is a broad equity fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Australia) rather than one theme or sector.

It also applies environmental, social and governance (ESG) screens, excluding companies that fail the issuer's ethical criteria.

What is under the hood of GRNV?

As at 3 Sept 2026, GRNV's ten largest holdings are Csl Ltd (5.3%), Westpac Banking Corp (5.0%), Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (5.0%), Transurban Group (5.0%), Macquarie Group Ltd (4.9%), Qbe Insurance Group Ltd (4.5%), Northern Star Resources Ltd (4.0%), Evolution Mining Ltd (3.9%), Brambles Ltd (3.4%) and Computershare Ltd (2.8%). Together they make up 43.9% of the fund.

It follows an index. Most broad share indices weight companies by market size, so the largest companies take the biggest share; the exact rules for GRNV's index are in the issuer's PDS. Its top 10 weighting of 43.9% compares with 53.0% for similar funds.

How well has VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF performed?

Based on its category, VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF aims to grow your capital in line with the index it tracks.

To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned −5.7% over 1 year (median 0.6%; ranked 52 of 65), 11.7% a year over 3 years (median 11.6% a year; ranked 26 of 54) and 5.7% a year over 5 years (median 6.9% a year; ranked 31 of 48). The medians and rankings compare it with Australian equity funds. Since listing in 2016 it has returned 6.6% a year.

Tracking difference is the gap between a fund's return and its index's return. We don't hold index returns, so we can't measure it for GRNV; the issuer reports it in the monthly fact sheet. As a guide, a well-run index fund trails its index by about its fee, here 0.35% a year, and a much bigger gap is a warning sign.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.