Hejaz High Income Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Global equity funds would cost $316 (0.63% a year), so HJHI is $329 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | −0.3 | 3.2 | −9.3 | 6.3 | 0.0 | −0.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | −0.5 | 1.0YTD | ||
| 2025 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 0.5 | −2.6 | 2.9 | −0.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 | −2.2 | 16.4 |
| 2024 | −3.5 | 3.1 | −4.5 | 3.1 | 3.1 | −4.0 | 0.5 | −2.5 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
HJHI questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Hejaz High Income Active ETF?
The issuer of Hejaz High Income Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a Global focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does HJHI double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for HJHI, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Hejaz High Income Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Hejaz High Income Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Hejaz / EQT decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
Among Global equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.99% a year and index funds 0.53%.
What will I pay in fees for HJHI?
HJHI charges a management fee of 1.10% a year, about $110 for every $10,000 invested. Only 7% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global equity funds, the median is 0.58%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include JPMorgan Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI) at 0.40% and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income Active ETF (Hedged) (JHPI) at 0.40%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.95% for HJHI.
Does Hejaz High Income Active ETF follow a theme?
Its focus is income. It favours investments that pay higher, regular distributions. Over the past year it paid out 2.4% of its price, across 2 payments.
What is under the hood of HJHI?
The issuer doesn't publish HJHI's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Hejaz High Income Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Hejaz High Income Active ETF aims mainly to pay a regular income, with capital growth secondary.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 0.6% over 1 year (median 4.6%; ranked 21 of 30). The medians and rankings compare it with Global equity funds. Since listing in 2024 it has returned 5.6% a year.
As an active fund, HJHI has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.