Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Global ex-Australia equity funds would cost $296 (0.59% a year), so LPGD is $335 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | −1.1 | −5.7 | −2.7 | 12.9 | 10.3 | 12.9 | −12.8 | 3.2 | 3.3 | −5.7 | 11.7YTD | ||
| 2025 | 5.7 | −6.6 | −8.6 | 1.5 | 10.1 | 13.6 | −1.9 | −2.7 | 2.2 | 7.0 | −7.2 | −0.7 | 10.0 |
| 2024 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 5.2 | −2.7 | 2.6 | 7.5 | −3.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 41.3 |
| 2023 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 8.6 | −4.1 | 14.7 | 2.8 | 6.1 | −2.0 | −5.6 | −1.6 | 14.2 | 3.6 | 60.9 |
| 2022 | −9.6 | −4.2 | 0.0 | −9.1 | −1.9 | −5.3 | 7.6 | −2.6 | −7.3 | 2.9 | 0.4 | −7.2 | −31.9 |
| 2021 | 5.0 | −4.4 | −1.1 | 5.7 | −2.7 | 11.1 | −0.3 | 2.8 | −5.5 | 1.3 | 11.5 | −2.0 | 21.7 |
| 2020 | 6.0 | −1.0 | −2.6 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 4.6 | 5.2 | −0.2 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 41.6 |
| 2019 | 7.8 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 6.5 | −9.0 | 6.5 | 3.2 | −0.7 | −2.5 | 2.7 | 7.6 | 0.1 | 35.2 |
| 2018 | 5.3 | 1.3 | −3.5 | 0.7 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 7.3 | −0.4 | −8.0 | −2.5 | −5.5 | 2.3 |
| 2017 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 7.4 | −4.6 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 6.9 | 3.2 | −3.1 | 28.0 |
| 2016 | 0.6 | 0.6 | −1.5 | 0.4 | 4.8 | −5.3 | 4.5 | 0.7 | −2.2 | −1.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.7 |
| 2015 | 6.5 | 2.3 | −1.8 | 2.1 | 1.5 | −3.8 | 6.8 | −1.4 | −2.8 | 3.0 | −3.1 | −1.3 | 7.6 |
| 2014 | −2.2 | 2.7 | −2.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | −0.1 | −0.4 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 11.2 |
| 2013 | 3.2 | 1.0 | −1.5 | 3.3 | 8.9 | 1.2 | 3.6 | −2.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 32.3 |
| 2012 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 5.1 | −2.2 | −1.5 | −1.5 | −1.3 | 3.3 | 1.5 | −0.4 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 11.7 |
| 2011 | 4.1 | 1.2 | −2.5 | −1.4 | 0.0 | −3.7 | −4.3 | −6.0 | −1.6 | −0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 | −13.1 |
| 2010 | −3.4 | 3.1 | −0.8 | −3.8 | −3.9 | −13.9 | −2.7 | 1.4 | 2.2 | −3.4 | −0.1 | −23.3 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
LPGD questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF?
The issuer of Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a Global ex-Australia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does LPGD double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for LPGD, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, but its returns move most closely with Betashares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ) (correlation 0.81), Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF (HYGG) (correlation 0.81) and Global X US 100 ETF (U100) (correlation 0.79). A correlation near 1 means the two funds tend to rise and fall together, so holding both adds little diversification.
How is Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Loftus Peak / EQT decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.75% a year and index funds 0.45%.
What will I pay in fees for LPGD?
LPGD charges a management fee of 1.20% a year, about $120 for every $10,000 invested. Only 5% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, the median is 0.55%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (VGS) at 0.18%, Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares (Hedged) ETF (VGAD) at 0.21% and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 0.40%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.31% for LPGD.
Does Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF follow a theme?
No. Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF is a broad equity fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (Global ex-Australia) rather than one theme or sector.
What is under the hood of LPGD?
The issuer doesn't publish LPGD's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF aims to grow your capital faster than its market after fees.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 6.3% over 1 year (median 6.3%; ranked 61 of 121), 25.5% a year over 3 years (median 16.5% a year; ranked 8 of 82) and 15.9% a year over 5 years (median 9.2% a year; ranked 7 of 66). The medians and rankings compare it with Global ex-Australia equity funds. Since listing in 2020 it has returned 12.1% a year.
As an active fund, LPGD has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.