Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Australian cash funds would cost $77 (0.15% a year), so MMKT is $15 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3.7YTD | ||
| 2025 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 4.3 |
| 2024 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 4.9 |
| 2023 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
MMKT questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF?
The issuer of Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as cash with a Australia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does MMKT double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for MMKT, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Betashares decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
What will I pay in fees for MMKT?
MMKT charges a management fee of 0.18% a year, about $18 for every $10,000 invested. That is cheaper than 87% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track, where the median fee is 0.44%. Among Australian cash funds, the median is 0.15%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL) at 0.07%, iShares Enhanced Cash ETF (ISEC) at 0.12% and Vaneck Cash Plus Active ETF (MONY) at 0.15%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.02% for MMKT.
Does Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF follow a theme?
No. Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF gives straightforward exposure to cash and short-term deposits rather than following a theme.
What is under the hood of MMKT?
The issuer doesn't publish MMKT's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Betashares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF aims mainly to pay a regular income, with capital growth secondary.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 4.4% over 1 year. The medians and rankings compare it with Australian cash funds. Since listing in 2023 it has returned 4.6% a year.
As an active fund, MMKT has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.