Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Global ex-Australia equity funds would cost $297 (0.59% a year), so QLTY is $113 cheaper.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
Look-through exposure as at 2 Sept 2026 · 149 securities · top 10 = 22.2%
Country
Sector
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | −2.2 | −1.8 | −5.4 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 6.2 | −1.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 | −2.0 | 4.7YTD | ||
| 2025 | 4.3 | −2.7 | −5.9 | 1.3 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.6 | −0.4 | 7.6 |
| 2024 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 2.5 | −4.5 | 0.4 | 4.4 | 1.3 | −0.5 | −0.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 25.5 |
| 2023 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 2.3 | −4.3 | −1.8 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 29.6 |
| 2022 | −9.2 | −7.0 | 2.3 | −4.9 | −1.9 | −5.8 | 6.4 | −3.0 | −4.1 | 6.4 | 2.5 | −3.2 | −20.8 |
| 2021 | −0.1 | −2.2 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 5.5 | −3.8 | −0.7 | 7.9 | −0.1 | 29.8 |
| 2020 | 5.4 | −6.6 | −0.9 | 4.6 | 4.1 | −1.5 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 0.9 | −0.6 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 13.5 |
| 2019 | 3.9 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 4.7 | −3.3 | 4.7 | 4.8 | −0.3 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 6.2 | −0.4 | 35.4 |
| 2018 | −3.7 | −3.7 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Top holdings
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
QLTY questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF?
Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF holds 149 securities, and its ten largest positions make up 22.2% of the fund, more spread out than the 36.4% typical of Global ex-Australia equity funds. That makes it moderately diversified.
Its largest country exposure is United States at 66.9%, and its biggest sector is Information Technology at 31.1%, based on holdings as at 2 Sept 2026.
Which ETFs does QLTY double up with most?
QLTY shares the most holdings with Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged (HQLT) (98% overlap), VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL) (34% overlap) and VanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF (QHAL) (34% overlap). Overlap is the share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common, looking through to the underlying securities.
At 98%, owning both QLTY and HQLT would mostly double up on the same investments rather than spread your money further.
How is Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF managed – active or passive?
Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF is passively managed: it follows an index and holds what that index holds, rather than relying on a manager's stock picks. Its index uses a quality approach, so it is sometimes called "smart beta".
Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.75% a year and index funds 0.45%.
What will I pay in fees for QLTY?
QLTY charges a management fee of 0.35% a year, about $35 for every $10,000 invested. That is cheaper than 58% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track, where the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global ex-Australia equity funds, the median is 0.55%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF (QMIX) at 0.18%.
If you would rather have a manager choose the investments, active options such as WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF (WCMQ) at 1.25% cost more.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.08% for QLTY.
Does Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF follow a theme?
Not a theme as such, but it follows a quality investment style: it screens for companies with strong profitability, stable earnings and low debt.
Other ASX funds using a quality approach include VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL), VanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF (QHAL), VanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF (QSML) and Betashares Australian Quality ETF (AQLT).
What is under the hood of QLTY?
As at 2 Sept 2026, QLTY's ten largest holdings are Palantir Technologies Inc (2.5%), Microsoft Corp (2.4%), Arista Networks Inc (2.3%), Visa Inc (2.3%), Johnson & Johnson (2.2%), Sony Group Corp (2.2%), Recruit Holdings Co Ltd (2.1%), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc (2.1%), Meta Platforms Inc (2.0%) and Netflix Inc (2.0%). Together they make up 22.2% of the fund.
Rather than simply weighting companies by market size, its index screens for companies with strong profitability, stable earnings and low debt.
How well has Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF performed?
Based on its category, Betashares Global Quality Leaders ETF aims to grow your capital in line with the index it tracks.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 2.9% over 1 year (median 6.3%; ranked 78 of 121), 14.7% a year over 3 years (median 16.8% a year; ranked 56 of 82) and 9.2% a year over 5 years (median 9.4% a year; ranked 35 of 66). The medians and rankings compare it with Global ex-Australia equity funds. Since listing in 2018 it has returned 13.5% a year.
Tracking difference is the gap between a fund's return and its index's return. We don't hold index returns, so we can't measure it for QLTY; the issuer reports it in the monthly fact sheet. As a guide, a well-run index fund trails its index by about its fee, here 0.35% a year, and a much bigger gap is a warning sign.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.