Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among Global ex-Australia property funds would cost $112 (0.22% a year), so RCAP is $323 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.6 | 8.4 | −8.8 | 7.6 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 1.7 | −4.1 | −5.1 | 0.6 | 5.8YTD | ||
| 2025 | 2.2 | 0.9 | −3.6 | 0.1 | 3.4 | −1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.4 | −1.2 | 7.4 |
| 2024 | −4.2 | 0.3 | 2.6 | −3.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 2.9 | −0.5 | 1.7 | −8.3 | 2.5 |
| 2023 | 7.5 | −3.1 | −4.4 | 2.4 | −3.3 | 3.5 | 1.6 | −1.9 | −6.9 | −3.5 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| 2022 | −5.4 | −2.0 | 8.5 | −1.4 | −8.5 | −6.7 | 4.1 | −5.3 | −12.1 | 2.7 | 4.3 | −4.1 | −24.7 |
| 2021 | −0.7 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 2.1 | −5.3 | 5.6 | −0.8 | 6.8 | 29.9 |
| 2020 | 2.9 | −8.1 | −18.1 | 6.1 | −0.1 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 0.8 | −2.6 | −2.7 | 7.3 | 1.8 | −9.6 |
| 2019 | 10.7 | 0.9 | 3.6 | −0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 2.2 | −0.5 | −0.7 | 23.7 |
| 2018 | −0.6 | −5.9 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 | −1.7 | −3.5 | 3.5 | −6.0 | −4.5 |
| 2017 | −0.9 | 3.2 | −1.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | −0.2 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 11.4 |
| 2016 | −4.1 | −1.2 | 8.2 | −0.9 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.7 | −1.7 | −1.9 | −3.0 | −0.7 | 3.5 | 6.9 |
| 2015 | 6.5 | −0.1 | 1.5 | −2.5 | 0.2 | −4.3 | 5.5 | −5.5 | 2.1 | 5.3 | −1.9 | 0.8 | 7.1 |
| 2014 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 2.0 | −4.3 | 8.6 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 27.0 |
| 2013 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 6.6 | −4.1 | −2.2 | 1.5 | −4.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | −2.9 | 1.0 | 8.2 |
| 2012 | 7.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.4 | −4.8 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 29.3 |
| 2011 | 3.8 | −1.7 | 3.7 | 2.3 | −12.6 | −0.7 | −7.1 | −9.9 | 10.1 | −3.0 | 1.3 | −14.8 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
RCAP questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF?
The issuer of Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as property with a Global ex-Australia focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does RCAP double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for RCAP, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, but its returns move most closely with iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLPR) (correlation 0.78). A correlation near 1 means the two funds tend to rise and fall together, so holding both adds little diversification.
How is Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF managed – active or passive?
Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF is actively managed. Rather than tracking an index, a fund manager at Resolution / Pinnacle decides what to buy and sell, aiming to do better than the market after fees.
What will I pay in fees for RCAP?
RCAP charges a management fee of 0.80% a year, about $80 for every $10,000 invested. Only 18% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among Global ex-Australia property funds, the median is 0.20%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF (VAP) at 0.23%, VanEck Australian Property ETF (MVA) at 0.35% and VanEck FTSE International Property (Hedged) ETF (REIT) at 0.20%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.35% for RCAP.
Does Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF follow a theme?
Yes. Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF focuses on property. Thematic funds are narrower than the broad market, so they can rise or fall much more than it does.
Other ASX funds with a property focus include Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF (VAP), VanEck Australian Property ETF (MVA), VanEck FTSE International Property (Hedged) ETF (REIT) and iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLPR).
What is under the hood of RCAP?
The issuer doesn't publish RCAP's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
As an active fund it has no index rule: the manager decides which investments to hold and how much of each, within the limits set out in the PDS.
How well has Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF performed?
Based on its category, Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF aims to grow your capital faster than its market after fees.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 5.5% over 1 year, 10.9% a year over 3 years and 0.2% a year over 5 years. The medians and rankings compare it with Global ex-Australia property funds. Since listing in 2022 it has returned 6.2% a year.
As an active fund, RCAP has no index to track. The fairer test is whether it beats similar funds and its market after fees, over several years.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.