Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF
Performance
Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.
What it costs to hold
Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.
A typical fund among United States equity funds would cost $190 (0.38% a year), so RGOS is $320 dearer.
Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.
Calendar-year returns
Where the money is
The issuer does not publish machine-readable holdings for this fund, so exposures and holdings overlap are not available. Return correlations still are.
Monthly returns
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | −2.1 | 0.0 | −5.8 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 5.7 | −1.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | −0.1 | 7.8YTD | ||
| 2025 | −2.2 | −4.9 | −1.7 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 0.0 | −0.7 | 5.3 |
Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.
Most similar funds
Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.
RGOS questions answered
Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
How diversified is Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF?
The issuer of Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF doesn't publish its holdings in a form we can read, so we can't measure how diversified it is. It is classed as equity with a United States focus; the product disclosure statement (PDS) and the issuer's fact sheet list what it owns.
Which ETFs does RGOS double up with most?
We can't compare holdings for RGOS, as the issuer doesn't publish them in a form we can read, and no fund's returns track it closely, so it offers a fairly distinct exposure.
How is Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF managed – active or passive?
Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF is passively managed: it follows an index and holds what that index holds, rather than relying on a manager's stock picks.
Among United States equity funds, active funds charge a median 0.43% a year and index funds 0.29%.
What will I pay in fees for RGOS?
RGOS charges a management fee of 0.95% a year, about $95 for every $10,000 invested. Only 14% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track charge more, and the median fee is 0.44%. Among United States equity funds, the median is 0.35%.
Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 0.04%, Betashares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ) at 0.48% and Vanguard US Total Market Shares Index ETF (VTS) at 0.03%.
The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.35% for RGOS.
Does Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF follow a theme?
No. Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF is a broad equity fund: it aims to cover a wide slice of its market (United States) rather than one theme or sector.
It also applies environmental, social and governance (ESG) screens, excluding companies that fail the issuer's ethical criteria.
What is under the hood of RGOS?
The issuer doesn't publish RGOS's holdings in a form we can read. Its website and fact sheet list the full portfolio.
It follows an index. Most broad share indices weight companies by market size, so the largest companies take the biggest share; the exact rules for RGOS's index are in the issuer's PDS.
How well has Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF performed?
Based on its category, Russell Sustainable Global Opportunities Complex ETF aims to grow your capital in line with the index it tracks.
To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned 7.5% over 1 year (median 6.6%; ranked 11 of 27). The medians and rankings compare it with United States equity funds. Since listing in 2025 it has returned 8.9% a year.
Tracking difference is the gap between a fund's return and its index's return. We don't hold index returns, so we can't measure it for RGOS; the issuer reports it in the monthly fact sheet. As a guide, a well-run index fund trails its index by about its fee, here 0.95% a year, and a much bigger gap is a warning sign.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.