Prices to 23 Oct 2026 · ASX report 30 Sept 2026Sign inJoin free
← Screener · Thematic / sector
SLFState Street · Property - Australia · Property · Australia

SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF

Fee p.a.
0.16%
ASX report
Fund size
A$464m
12m flow A$7.3m
Yield
5.4%
4 payments / yr
Volatility 3y
19.5%
annualised
Max DD 3y
−22.3%
all-time −73.2%
Listed
2009
2 Jan 2009 · spread 0.14%

Growth of $10,000

Since listing, distributions reinvested
$2k$4k$6k$8k$10k$12k$14k$16k$18k2008201120142017202020232026
$10,000 at listing → $14,328 at 23 Oct 2026. Monthly points, distributions reinvested, before franking.

Performance

Period
Total
ASX
1 month
0.7%
−1.6%
3 months
−8.8%
—
6 months
−6.0%
—
Year to date
−14.8%
—
1 year
−19.4%
−14.4%
3 years p.a.
9.1%
9.2%
5 years p.a.
1.7%
2.9%
10 years p.a.
5.1%
—
Since listing p.a.
1.1%
—

Total return to 23 Oct 2026, distributions reinvested, before franking. ASX figures are to 30 Sept 2026 and gross of franking, so they run higher for franked Australian funds.

Sharpe 3y 0.26Vol 1y 19.3%Vol 5y 20.4%Max DD 1y −22.3%Max DD 5y −30.7%Best year 26.3%71% positive years

What it costs to hold

Management fee plus trading costs, compared with similar funds.

Hold for
$94over 5 years, or 0.19% a year
Management fee (0.16% a year)
$80
Bid-ask spread (0.14%, paid once)
$14
Brokerage (buy and sell)
$0

A typical fund among property funds would cost $156 (0.31% a year), so SLF is $63 cheaper.

Spread is the average gap between buying and selling prices on the ASX. Fees are shown on a flat balance, not compounded on growth. Excludes tax and any adviser or platform fees.

Calendar-year returns

2009
−1.0%
2010
−4.1%
2011
−8.2%
2012
23.7%
2013
4.8%
2014
26.3%
2015
14.9%
2016
12.4%
2017
4.9%
2018
2.9%
2019
19.1%
2020
−3.5%
2021
24.6%
2022
−20.8%
2023
16.5%
2024
19.2%
2025
8.0%
2026
−14.8%

Where the money is

Look-through exposure as at 2 Sept 2026 · 18 securities · top 10 = 91.0%

Country

Australia100.0%

Sector

Real Estate100.0%

Monthly returns

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecYear
2026−2.7−3.3−10.97.63.24.2−1.9−6.9−1.6−2.2−14.8YTD
20253.9−6.7−4.55.76.21.72.74.3−2.90.6−4.11.88.0
20241.15.19.8−8.12.50.46.9−0.26.9−2.62.8−5.419.2
20237.7−1.1−6.35.4−1.90.33.72.2−8.2−6.410.911.516.5
2022−10.00.92.00.0−8.5−9.811.1−3.8−13.19.45.8−3.5−20.8
2021−5.3−3.07.32.11.96.1−0.56.6−2.60.84.75.224.6
20205.8−3.3−36.914.08.9−1.6−0.18.4−1.3−0.513.51.3−3.5
20196.11.56.6−2.61.74.92.4−0.6−0.91.06.4−8.019.1
2018−3.4−3.00.24.33.22.20.72.5−1.5−3.60.01.72.9
2017−4.54.00.52.0−0.9−4.70.00.90.72.45.2−0.14.9
20161.01.92.53.22.53.54.8−2.3−4.2−8.30.77.512.4
20158.33.5−2.3−1.72.7−3.45.5−4.40.14.9−2.44.114.9
20140.63.9−1.15.00.83.24.71.4−5.46.10.84.226.3
20132.83.2−2.08.0−4.4−0.2−0.8−1.01.72.2−2.0−2.24.8
20124.42.5−3.24.6−0.62.95.1−0.11.54.5−1.61.823.7
2011−0.83.2−2.20.6−0.7−2.4−6.52.3−5.34.01.0−1.2−8.2
2010−2.31.1−1.82.9−4.6−0.5−0.13.4−1.2−0.9−2.52.7−4.1
2009−9.1−17.1−0.63.05.31.33.615.07.4−8.30.02.5−1.0
2008−4.90.43.0−9.0−16.7−5.010.2−7.1−23.40.1−10.7−50.4

Total return each month in %, distributions reinvested, before franking. The latest month runs to the last price date. The first year starts from listing.

Top holdings

Goodman GroupAustralia
38.0%
Scentre Group LtdAustralia
13.1%
StocklandAustralia
7.7%
Vicinity CentresAustralia
6.9%
Charter Hall GroupAustralia
6.3%
Gpt GroupAustralia
6.2%
Mirvac GroupAustralia
5.1%
DexusAustralia
4.4%
Region Re LtdAustralia
1.8%
Charter Hall LongAustralia
1.6%
Bwp GroupAustralia
1.6%
Homeco Daily NeedsAustralia
1.5%
Charter Hall RetaiAustralia
1.4%
Centuria IndustriaAustralia
1.1%
Waypoint ReitAustralia
1.1%
See all 18 holdings →

Most similar funds

Overlap is the share of the portfolio held in common, look-through. Correlation is of daily returns. High overlap means close substitutes.

Code
Fund
Fee
Overlap
Corr 3y
Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF
0.23%
96%
0.84
VanEck Australian Property ETF
0.35%
61%
0.61
Betashares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF
0.49%
17%
0.66
Vanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF
0.30%
11%
0.61
iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
0.09%
11%
0.67
VanEck Geared Australian Equal Weight Complex ETF
0.35%
10%
0.68
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
0.35%
10%
0.59
VanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF
0.45%
10%
0.55
VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF
0.35%
9%
0.61
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
0.25%
9%
0.58
Compare SLF with these →

SLF questions answered

Written from the latest data on this page. General information only, not financial advice.

How diversified is SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF?

SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF holds 18 securities.

Its country exposure is almost entirely Australia (100.0%), based on holdings as at 2 Sept 2026.

Which ETFs does SLF double up with most?

SLF shares the most holdings with Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF (VAP) (96% overlap), VanEck Australian Property ETF (MVA) (61% overlap) and Betashares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF (FAIR) (17% overlap). Overlap is the share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common, looking through to the underlying securities.

At 96%, owning both SLF and VAP would mostly double up on the same investments rather than spread your money further.

How is SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF managed – active or passive?

SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF is passively managed: it follows an index and holds what that index holds, rather than relying on a manager's stock picks.

Among property funds, active funds charge a median 0.88% a year and index funds 0.20%.

What will I pay in fees for SLF?

SLF charges a management fee of 0.16% a year, about $16 for every $10,000 invested. That is cheaper than 90% of the 471 ASX ETFs we track, where the median fee is 0.44%. Among property funds, the median is 0.29%.

Lower-cost funds with a similar focus include iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLPR) at 0.15%.

If you would rather have a manager choose the investments, active options such as Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF (RCAP) at 0.80% and Quay Global Real Estate Fund (AUD Hedged) Active ETF (QGFH) at 0.92% cost more.

The fee is taken from the fund's assets and is already reflected in its returns. You'll also pay brokerage when you buy or sell, and the bid-ask spread, which has averaged 0.14% for SLF.

Does SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF follow a theme?

Yes. SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF focuses on property. Thematic funds are narrower than the broad market, so they can rise or fall much more than it does.

Other ASX funds with a property focus include Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF (VAP), Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF (RCAP), VanEck Australian Property ETF (MVA) and VanEck FTSE International Property (Hedged) ETF (REIT).

What is under the hood of SLF?

As at 2 Sept 2026, SLF's ten largest holdings are Goodman Group (38.0%), Scentre Group Ltd (13.1%), Stockland (7.7%), Vicinity Centres (6.9%), Charter Hall Group (6.3%), Gpt Group (6.2%), Mirvac Group (5.1%), Dexus (4.4%), Region Re Ltd (1.8%) and Charter Hall Long (1.6%). Together they make up 91.0% of the fund.

It follows an index; the issuer's PDS sets out how that index chooses and weights its holdings.

How well has SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF performed?

Based on its category, SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF aims to grow your capital in line with the index it tracks.

To 23 Oct 2026, with distributions reinvested, it returned −19.4% over 1 year (median 0.1%; ranked 7 of 7), 9.1% a year over 3 years (median 10.5% a year; ranked 5 of 7) and 1.7% a year over 5 years (median 1.7% a year; ranked 2 of 6). The medians and rankings compare it with property funds. Since listing in 2009 it has returned 1.1% a year.

Tracking difference is the gap between a fund's return and its index's return. We don't hold index returns, so we can't measure it for SLF; the issuer reports it in the monthly fact sheet. As a guide, a well-run index fund trails its index by about its fee, here 0.16% a year, and a much bigger gap is a warning sign.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.